Tags: centrist, conservative, Conservatives, dede scozzafava, GOP, ideology, moderate, Moderate Republicans, moderates, republican, Republican Party
Fellow Republicans United blogger, Bill Golden had this to say earlier today about moderate and/or centrist Republicans:
And for moderates  you need to find some principles quick. Being “moderate†or “centrist†is a mode. If you keep standing in the middle of the road whining that no one is stopping to give you a kiss … then you are just going to get your arse run over. Become a liberal, libertarian or conservative or whatever, but get some principles and go with it. Defend them. Live them. Be “moderate†when it comes to time to work out agreement but please stop standing in the middle of the road.
It made me think a lot about the fate of the so-called moderate Republican, a moniker that I have long used to describe myself. I have been long frustrated with my fellow moderates for some the reasons that Bill has argued, specifically, that we tend to stand in the middle of the road whining that no one will give us a kiss. And because we sit there whining about the state of moderates in the party, we ended up getting our asses handed to us again and again.
I know that I might hurt some feelings here, but I am starting to think that a lot of moderates are some of the most feckless, flighty and downright cowardly people. We do not stand up for our convictions. At times, I wonder if we even have convictions. We whine about the dwindling state of the GOP, about how it is being taken over by extremists, but when it comes down to making a difference, we offer no solutions other than pleading for the Republican leadership to love us.
Right now, Dede Scozzafava is losing a race she should have won. For those not in the know, Scozzafava is running for a seat in Congress to represent the 23rd Congressional District in New York. The GOP leadership in Washington has realized it needs moderates in order to win and has backed her. But this has enraged many on the far right because she is more an old-school conservative or Northeastern Republican. They don’t like that she is pro-choice and supports gay marriage. So they have rebelled and supported Doug Hoffman, a candidate for the Conservative Party. Because of this, Bill Owens, the Democratic candidate is now in the lead and could well win the race, the first time a Democrat has won in that district since before the Civil War.
The far right has attacked Scozzafava with everything they’ve got. And it is working. So where are the moderates? What are they doing? Well, the answer is not much. There are other moderate bloggers, but few have taken up the cause. Here is a fellow moderate that is being assaulted by the far right, and all we can do is….well nothing.
Moderate Republicanism has along and proud history. It has shown a more humane conservatism. Geoffrey Kabaservice has done a wonderful series on New Majority on the role of moderates in the GOP that you should read. But even Kabaservice tends to drift into a territory of wallowing instead of calling people to action.
But wallowing in the past and whining about the future will not change the GOP. What will change the party is when good people of conviction have the balls to fight for change.
But that means that we have to have principles. And sometimes I wonder if we do. Sometimes I think that moderates are more about going along to get along than in acutally believing in something enough that they will defend it.
I didn’t grow up as a Republican. I came to Republicanism after doing a lot of thinking and reading. I came to the conclusion that I believed in some of the values of conservatism as preached by people like Edmund Burke. I knew there was a place for government, but I believed that it could not and should not solve every problem. I believed in the equality of opportunity but not the equality of outcomes. I’m a Republican because of the values I came to believe in. I am a moderate Republican because while I hold these values, I also am pragmatic. Being a moderate to me means holding both in balance.
My guess is that too many moderates have not given much thought as to why they are Republicans. Maybe they just grew up that way. And along the way, they lost any reason to fight for their party. It became such a part of them that the party became nothing to them.
Earlier this year, when Arlen Specter left the GOP to sit with the Dems, there was a lot of handwringing about how the GOP treats its moderates. I think that was a worthy thing to chat about, but I think Specter showed a lot more about the soul of some moderates. As David Broder noted back in April, Specter is one of the most opportunistic politicians out there. And it has shown itself in the fact that since his primary challenge, he has voted with the Dems 97 percent of the time.
The whole Specter affair at times seems to sum up some of what is at the heart of what is called moderate Republicanism: it is too opportunitistic, too willing to abandon any belief in order to get approval.
In short, moderate Republicanism at least in 2009 seems to be hallow, with little substance. We don’t care enough about the GOP to be willing to put up a fight. If you don’t really have any strong beliefs, then why in the world would you fight?
This is why Dede Scozzafava has very little support from fellow moderates. If you are lukewarm, well why would you lift a finger to help anyone?
You want to know the sad thing here? It’s that those Tea Party folks, the ones that make us squirm, at least have their convictions. They at least believe in something worth fighting for. I might dislike them, but I have admire their energy. I can’t say they same for my fellow moderates. We are lazy.
Those of us who call ourselves moderate Republicans (and those that call themselves former moderates) need to ask ourselves: is the work to make the GOP a truly Big Tent party, worth fighting for? Is moderate Republicanism worth fighting for? If it’s not then, we should just give up. If it is, then we need to get off our asses and get to work. As Bill noted, we need to pick a philosophy and defend it.
Otherwise, quit whining. You’re wasting my time.
Horseshit. This is yet another example of the self-indulgent theme of our times– the exaltation of direction over degree. We always think “what?” and “why?” are more dramatic and entertaining and self-pleasing questions than “how much?” is. But “how much” is not only highly relevant nevertheless but central to the beliefs of a moderate. Want a moderate philosophy? Here it is:
The extremists on both side are populist mediocrities who wish the world to be made to be a place amenable to their sensibilities, their intuition. How does that relate to which question we focus on, direction or degree? This way– Intuition is howlingly abysmal, staggeringly, unbelievably rotten, at judging amount. There is almost no such thing in any given situation as a number, usually a dollar figure, which is intuitive. Any number, any degree of inconvenient value by others that gets in the way of whatever direction is fashionable at some time and among some group will be discounted as much as needs be for that group to get its ego fed by cheap self-righteousness.
This is why communism and socialism don’t work as general systems any better than theocracies do. They all rely on morality, a form of intuition, as a way of solving questions of distribution and value, which are so central to the idea of justice. Capitalists and moderates are alike in pragmatically dealing more with degree than direction.
Not standing for anything? Guano. We’re the only sane ones here. I’m really not interested in whether others think I’m being run over; I decline to get out of the way for the convenience of the false dichotomies of either side.