<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="WordPress/2.9.2" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Republicans United.</title>
	<link>http://republicansunited.us</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:46:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>Another Take on the Tea Parties</title>
		<description><![CDATA[In what seems to be a long running series on the Tea Party movement here at RU, blogger Jazz Shaw of the Moderate Voice shares his latest encounter with the movement. ]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/another-take-on-the-tea-parties/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Social Conservatism?  It’s the government…Stupid</title>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not Social Conservatism. It is something that, wherever we are in the economic/governing ideological spectrum, most of us as reform republicans can agree on.  As the health-care bill continues in its congressional struggle and more and more eyes begin to look towards the 2010 elections, we start to see the basic and obvious [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/social-conservatism-it%e2%80%99s-the-government%e2%80%a6stupid/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Who Mourns for the Moderate Republican?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The short answer?  Probably no one. 
It seems that way at times.  Republicans tend to consider moderates and their liberal Republican cousins, traitors.  Democrats profess their love of moderates usually years after they were in office.
The history of moderate Republicans is one that is not well known.  It tends to be [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/who-mourns-for-the-moderate-republican/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Neoconservatism Reconsidered</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe Neoconservatism wasn't so bad after all.]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/neoconservatism-reconsidered/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Most Important Election You&#8217;ve Never Heard Of</title>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a runoff election in Houston scheduled for April 13th that will determine who will hold one of the most important political offices in Texas.  From that platform, the winner will be able to wield significant influence over the Party structure in that state and elsewhere.  It will receive very little press and almost no campaign contributions.  Few citizens will show up to vote.]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/the-most-important-election-youve-never-heard-of/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pity the Poor Gay Conservative</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I really used to believe that if you present someone with the facts, they would be persuaded to see another person&#8217;s viewpoint as valid. 
Case in point: I used to believe that if I showed my liberal friends that one can be a gay Republican and be out and proud and also show that there are [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/pity-the-poor-gay-conservative/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tea Party Series: Stray from the GOP and Everyone will lose</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington (CNN):
Mitt Romney has a message to Tea Party candidates nationwide: If you lose your
Republican primary bids, stay on the sidelines.
The former Massachusetts
governor on Monday warned the grassroots movement not to mount third party
efforts in general elections, which he said would siphon votes from Republican
nominees.
&#8220;If there is a conservative candidate that runs in the general
election, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/tea-party-series-stray-from-the-gop-and-everyone-will-lose/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>From the &#8220;Stay Classy&#8221; Department</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, this is a good reason to be conservative.  Good grief.
]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/from-the-stay-classy-department/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Weak Tea?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Per William Golden&#8217;s post, Politico reports how the Tea Party isn&#8217;t really shaking up the political establishment.
]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/weak-tea/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Tea Party Effect On Texas Republican Primary Elections: &#8220;More flash than bang&#8221; and &#8220;A weak brew.&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Eleven Republican incumbents had Tea Party challengers in the recent elections in Texas.
Ten of the eleven Tea Party challengers went down to defeat. Incumbent Republican State Rep. Tommy Merritt lost to Tea Party challenger David Simpson, running as a Republican.
James Henson, director of the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas, commented after analyzing [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/tea-party-effect-on-texas-republican-primary-elections-more-flash-than-bang-and-a-weak-brew/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Weekend Book Review: John Gray’s “Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia”</title>
		<description><![CDATA[

In Gray’s book his first line says it all “Modern politics is a chapter in the history of religion.” He argues that the modern urge to create a Utopia is nothing more and a secular religious impulse. From Publishers Weekly:

Some readers will see pessimism where others see sober appraisal in Gray’s antiutopian argument that we [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/weekend-book-review-john-gray%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cblack-mass-apocalyptic-religion-and-the-death-of-utopia%e2%80%9d/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>&#8220;Colorblind Republicans&#8221;</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Ivory takes the GOP to task for avoiding race.
]]></description>
		<link>http://republicansunited.us/2010/03/colorblind-republicans/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
